1) Why has the Constitution been able to informally change? Give some examples.
Because it is a very general document that doesn’t specify a lot of things
I.E. The constitution gave congress the power to regulate
commerce, but they didn’t say what they could do. This allowed the authorities
the power to regulate child labor and commercials.
2) How has Congress expanded the executive branch?
By creating the cabinet departments, agencies, boards, and
commissions
3) What is the impeachment process? What crimes can a
President be impeached for?
The house may impeach, or accuse, federal officials, and it
is up to the senate to determine if they are guilty or innocent. Conduct that
violates constitutional responsibilities and implies a clear neglect of duty.
4) Discuss John Tyler's Presidency. How did he
interpret the Constitution? What is the other view of this
interpretation?
He took the presidential oath of office, and finished out the term. Other thoughts he should just assume the position of president until another one could be elected.
He took the presidential oath of office, and finished out the term. Other thoughts he should just assume the position of president until another one could be elected.
5) What is an executive agreement? How has it expanded
the powers of the President?
it is a agreement made directly between the president and the head of state of another country. It has weakened the constitutional checks and balances, giving the president.
it is a agreement made directly between the president and the head of state of another country. It has weakened the constitutional checks and balances, giving the president.
6) Discuss the two views of Judicial Review.
judicial restraint – court should avoid taking the initiative on social and political questions, uphold acts of congress unless it clearly violates the constitution (the court should leave the development of new policies to others)
judicial restraint – court should avoid taking the initiative on social and political questions, uphold acts of congress unless it clearly violates the constitution (the court should leave the development of new policies to others)
judicial activism – court should play an active role in
shaping national policies, should boldly apply the constitution to pressing
social and political questions
7) Give an example of how the Supreme Court has ruled the
Constitution meaning one thing and then later changing its mind.
in 1896, African Americans ruled to have separate public facilities for African Americans, and they repealed it in 1954
in 1896, African Americans ruled to have separate public facilities for African Americans, and they repealed it in 1954
8) State the four sources of informal constitutional change.
Customs/Changes of the times
Customs/Changes of the times
Presidential actions
Federal courts
Congressional actions
9) How could judicial activism infringe on powers given
Congress in the Constitution?
It can say that congress is wrong in a decision they make
No comments:
Post a Comment